Donruss.
What is the first thing that comes to mind?
I bet most collectors would go with Rated Rookies......
or Diamond Kings......
Maybe if you're under 30, the answer is unlicensed baseball cards.
After Pinnacle went bankrupt in 1999, there were no Donruss sets for two years. In 2001, Playoff attempted to revive the brand, plus do some revisionist history and create Donruss sets for both the 1999 and 2000 calendar years. It was interesting to say the least, but ultimately not very satisfying in large part due to the fact that Playoff messed up the two must-haves in any Donruss set.
See above.
The 2001 Donruss boxes included a graded card as a box topper. I believe Beckett was launching their grading service and Playoff was relaunching Donruss. The graded cards were largely late 1980s Donruss issues that included the likes of Devon White and B.J. Surhoff. Nothing wrong with either player, but not many collectors want one of their graded rookie cards as a box topper.
What did I pull?
Gary Sheffield was a good player, but what is the value of a 7.5 grade Gary Sheffield 1989 Donruss? Didn't Beckett originally charge $10 when they first started grading cards? There is zero chance that this card is worth $10.
Let's check out the back for the breakdowns on that 7.5 grade.
I am going to issue a spoiler here and let you know that Playoff went bankrupt too, which is why we have the unlicensed Donruss set produced by Panini. It took four years, but in retrospect it should have been four months.
Here is the base card design.
I honestly like the appearance of these cards. The colored borders are nice with the star background fading out from top to bottom. Simple player name bar with the player position and team logo on each side. I even like the 20th Anniversary logo that Playoff stamped on each card. Donruss was not a very expensive set either ($1.99 per pack), getting this across the finish line should have been as simple as Playoff providing a decent ser of Diamond King and Rated Rookie cards.
Here is the back of the card.....
Again, it's simple, but it does the job for a base Donruss set. If Playoff really wanted to win me over, they would have gone landscape and used the standard 1980s Donruss card back. That's probably asking too much. This is fine though. Plus, these cards have on-base percentage. We can't replace Barry Bonds if he leaves as a free agent, but we maybe (not) able to recreate him through the aggregate.
Almost sure Billy Beane said that once.
One of the things that stands out to me as I flipped through the cards in this set was the number of established, veteran players who were in odd places during 2001. I picked seven that stood out to me and got lazy with the scanning.
All seven in one scan.....
So, that is Eric Davis on the Giants, Rickey Henderson on the Mariners, Jose Canseco on the Angels, Andres Galarraga on the Rangers, David Cone on the Red Sox, David Wells on the White Sox, and Hideo Nomo on the Red Sox. Nomo actually threw a no-hitter on the Red Sox, so maybe that one is not quite as jarring as the rest.
My favorite Cardinals card is Rick Ankiel.
This was after his yips had started. His cards dried up by the end of 2001 and did not reappear until he came back as an outfielder. I like that you can see the pitch grip in the picture, which appears to be a change-up. The rest of the Cardinals in this set are the standard from the time, McGwire, Edmonds, Kile, Matt Morris, etc. No Pujols even though it was a 2001 product.
Favorite former Durham Bulls player is Ryan Klesko, largely because he has the lamb chop sideburns on the back photograph. If you are not going to picture him on a surf board for his baseball card, highlighting his sideburns is the next best move.
Which brings me to the weirdness of Playoff trying to recreate Donruss sets for both 1999 and 2000. This nonsense had never been tried before the 2001 Donruss set and has not been attempted since either. Well, at least I don't think it has been tried again. We are all lucky that everyone learned their lesson with this set.
I cannot place my hands on many of my imaginary 2000 Donruss cards, which were sold in retail packs, so I will focus my energy on the 1999s, which were sold in hobby packs.
Players were shown on their 1999 teams on a design that was not nearly as good as the one Playoff used for the 2001 cards. The 2000 cards are not great either. Although, these do feel really similar to the set designs that Pinnacle was using for Donruss right before they went bankrupt.
I personally like the back of the 1999 Donruss Jim Edmonds card. The design is nothing great, but Jimmy Edmonds lost his half-shirt Cardinals windbreaker and reverted to back to "Anaheim Jimmy" complete with frosted hair and designer, colored-lens sunglasses.
Gripes about Yankees fans going to DisneyLand and then filling up Angel Stadium were not included on the back, which is really too bad. If you are going to make up cards from previous years, you might as well do some pre-trade foreshadowing.
I am not saying Ray Lankford is going to find his own doctor if his knees ever need to be cleaned up, but he's not using the team doctors....
Finding your own doctor. That's not the type of thing that would cause hurt feelings and a trade, right?
Let's get down to business.
This is a Donruss set and we all want to see the Diamond King cards and the Rated Rookies. For me as a long-time collector, I have a really hard time with the 2001 Donruss set because of these two long running brand staples having huge flaws.
This is the design for the Diamond Kings set.
The artwork of Sosa is fine, but the giant border stinks. The Diamond Kings logo at the bottom also stinks. Playoff bought all the brand name and imaging rights for all of Pinnacle's old brands, why not use them? I did not scan the back, but the write-up falls short in comparison to previous Diamond Kings sets. The checklist is also terrible.
Traditionally, every team got a Diamond Kings card in every Donruss set regardless of where they finished in the standings. When I was in middle school and the Cardinals were medicore at best, I still got a Diamond Kings card of Felix Jose. For 2001, Playoff only included 20 players, which included multiple Braves and Yankees.
Some players on the checklist were not even deserving of Diamond Kings card.
Mark McGwire was oft-injured during the 2000 and 2001, but still ended up with a Diamond Kings card. There were plenty of other good choices on those Cardinals teams with Jim Edmonds, Darryl Kile, Matt Morris, and J.D. Drew.
The 2001 Diamond Kings are a definite negative when grading this set, but nothing compared to the disappointment I have towards the Rated Rookies. Again, Playoff owned the name and branding rights for all of the Pinnacle brands.
Rated Rookie cards should have the logo. This is the only acceptable answer.
This is ugly.
White border, black name bar, Anniversary logo. Whatever. I don't card about any of it, because some designer working for Playoff murdered this card by using some middle school quality Microsoft Word Word Art "Rated Rookie" logo. Worse, beyond using the logo at the bottom of the card in color form, they repeated the logo in the background of the border.
How much better does this card look with the standard Rated Rookie logo?
So, how does it rank?
This set has been out 21 years and I have not forgotten the fact that Playoff screwed up the Rated Rookies and Diamond Kings.
No mercy.
Yeah, that's a LOT of short-term stops! Rickey is actually TWO of them, because he's shown in a Seattle uniform but the logo is for the Padres. He stuck with the Padres longer but it's certainly not how we usually picture him.
ReplyDeleteI find 2001 Donruss a pretty nice set, but you're quite right that the DK and RR designs aren't up to snuff.
Good catch on the Padres logo. I missed that detail. ADD must have been on overdrive when I was scanning these cards to let that one slip.
DeleteYeah, the Diamond Kings are crummy. But as I wasn't collecting back in 2001, I have very few of them. So if you dislike them, send them my way! Oh, and a graded card as a box topper? Crazy weird. Too bad they aren't worth squat.
ReplyDeleteIf I ever break up my collection, I will pencil you in for all of my Diamond Kings.
DeleteThat buyback is interesting and kind of cool (in a novelty sort of way). I have the Biggio from the same product. It's a shame they didn't stamp it, then it'd be really cool.
ReplyDeleteNovelty is a great description. I have actually long wanted a Cardinals or Durham Bulls player from the graded box toppers, but there are not any. Figure they would have included an Ozzie or Willie McGee, but apparently not.
DeleteAs always, great review. I wasn't collecting at the time, and I only saw base cards from this set for the first time just last year, but I too really like the base design. The colored borders are easily my favorite aspect of it. As far as the topper goes, yeah, that was pretty terrible. I know that a lot of boxes have featured graded cards since the days of this set, but from what I've seen, they always stick 9.5's and 10's in there. Putting a 7.5 in this box was just silly. Of course too, it then makes me wonder if they put anything graded lower in one of these boxes?
ReplyDeleteThere are lower graded cards on COMC and Ebay. There is a Kevin Brown that is a 7 and Cal Ripken that is 6.5. In the words of Kevin from Home Alone, "Woof".
Delete