Saturday, July 30, 2022

Now, That's A Name I Have Not Heard In A Long Time

Topps Pristine?  

Jack Flaherty?

The last time I opened a pack of Topps Pristine cards, I was trying to chase down some So Taguchi and Jason Simontacchi rookie cards. I do not think either of those players have appeared in a game during the past decade. Although, I still enjoy looking at their baseball cards.  

Here is my copy of the one of the Topps Pristine Simontacchi card. 

Whatever your opinion of short-lived long-relievers who get the occasional spot start, Topps Pristine were nice cards. They had a nice design, although the checklist was a little gimmicky, and the packs came with encased cards in separate packs inside the regular pack. If you could get past some of the packaging oddities, I am not really sure why Topps decided to stop making these cards.

I am also not sure why Topps decided to bring back this product line after a 15 year hiatus. I was intrigued when I saw other people talking about it, so I went and checked out some of the different Cardinals and former Durham Bulls players who had cards in the set. There were the usual selection of Nolan Arenado, Goldschmidt, Yadier Molina, and Wander Franco cards.  

They were are a little more than what I wanted to spend for a card that was as much brand nostalgia as it was trying to purchase a card of a player that I collected. I was about to move on when I saw a really cheap copy of a Jack Flaherty autograph.

Topps Pristine disappeared for a long time, just like Jack Flaherty has seemingly disappeared from the baseball diamond. It seemed like a perfect pairing.  

This Flaherty Topps Pristine autograph is one of the encased cards.

 
 
Quality signature as far as Flaherty 'graphs. I like the clear white space at the bottom of the card for the signature. The background design is decent, although it reminds me a bit of one of those graphics created to show the political party breakdown of the House or Senate with the blue and red dots jumbled up. 
 
 
 
Honestly, I have probably been teaching too long. 


The back design has the usual, boring congratulations letter about pulling an autograph from a pack of cards. I am not sure what is happening with the big red blob here. Is Congress being launched into the sun or is this some sort of psychological tests given to the person who pulled this $10 autograph from a $500 box of cards?

Monday, July 25, 2022

Random Ray - 2001 Fleer Platinum

Fleer released their first "Platinum" set in 2001. 

Platinum sounds so shiny and sparkly. The set was anything but those two things, and honestly that is not really a bad thing. Platinum celebrated the 20th Anniversary of the initial Fleer set, which was released in 1981. I thought that maybe the Platinum name came from one of those official lists of Anniversary gifts. After consulting the internet, the 20th Anniversary is actually supposed to be a gift of China.  

I prefer that Fleer celebrated their 20th Anniversary with baseball cards rather than distributing plates, bowls, and tea cups. I actually really enjoy this set and feel like it has aged really well.  

Here is the front of the card, which borrow its design from the 1981 debut Fleer baseball set.  



There are some small differences between the original set and the 2001 Fleer Platinum remake. First, the card stock is way better. The first Fleer set was cheaply printed. The color scheme for the Cardinals is the same as the original with the yellow name bar and red border. The baseball in the corner originally had the Cardinals name in red. Again, small things.  

Many of the cards in 2001 Fleer Platinum have posed photos from Spring Training. Lankford is no different. I like this pose and the angle of the photo looking up at him. Fleer used this camera angle on several of the posed photo in the set. Just something different than the head on photo shot. 

Flip the card over.....


The back has elements from several different Fleer sets. They always had the full stats from a player's career, but the font was always so small. You can't tell me that Fleer could not have made Lankford's stat line larger and still fit the graphs at the bottom of the card.  

I really like the graph at the bottom showing the breakdown of batting average, on-base percentage, and slugging percentage. Feels very sabermetric for 2001. Although, I guess this card was made a year before the "Moneyball" era started with the A's, so maybe not.  

Overall, a very nice card.  

Saturday, July 23, 2022

Set Appreciation Post #17 - Topps Lineage

Topps Lineage is really an off-brand version of Topps Archives.

Yes, there are positives here, but I think there are limitations because of its format.  

Same general idea as far as the checklist goes, but rather than recycling a bunch of their former card designs, Topps used the same border for all the cards. Looks like something that was likely a rejected design for one of their base sets at some point.  

Here is the basic design.  




I like the photograph of Koufax, but there is just nothing really special or interesting about the design of this card. It's just not very good.  

Back of the card.  




No stats on the back. I actually like this idea for this type of set, especially given the way that Topps wrote these snippets. If you had to summarize the career of Sandy Koufax in two sentences, it would be difficult to do a better job than what is on the back of this card. The modern players are just as well done. 

The card backs are a positive for this set.  

Similar to the Koufax card, there are plenty of other older players throughout the set. 


Whoever made the set actually did a good job of picking out former players. Nice mix from all different areas. The older players, such as Tris Speaker, are generally colorized, but the card photos still look decent. The photography on the older players is another positive in Topps Lineage.  


I like that Lenny Harris makes an appearance on the Ryne Sandberg card. He's a first ballot guy if someone ever makes a Hall of Fame for utility and bench players. Also shout out to Topps for not using the cringeworthy Milwaukee Braves logo from the 1950s and 1960s, even if they used the cringeworthy Cleveland Indians logo on the modern players.  

Any set that has a subset of cards with Topps All-Star Rookie Trophies can't be all that bad, right?  



Favorite Cardinals card.  



Bob Gibson.  

Favorite former Durham Bulls card.  




Evan Longoria.  

Best non-Cardinal/non-Durham Bulls card.  




An aquward looking, 21 year-old Freddie Freeman.  

How many Braves players have baseball cards with this same pose at the Braves Spring Training Stadium?  

It's a lot.  

Topps Lineage is still not all sunshine, lollipops, and rainbows.  



There is still the ever-present horrible airbrushing. I picked out two different examples. The Adrian Beltre card is just incredibly bad. The Damon card is not quite as bad, but they airbrushed him out of a Tigers uniform, but left Jim Leyland in the background.  

If Jim Leyland were smoking in the background, I would forgive the bad airbrushing.  

Topps used the parallels from their flagship sets on the Lineage cards. A bunch of sparkles and colors that do not look very good with this card design.  



Sparkly Lou Gehrig?  

No.  

However, I do like the cloth cards based on the old Cloth Stickers. Topps had some cloth/silk parallels around in different products around this time. Good looking cards that they should consider bringing back.  




I have thought about finding all of the Cardinals and former Durham Bulls cloth sticker cards from this set, but that is somewhere way down on the list of things to do. 

Let's talk about another positive.  

The inserts are great, but similar to the Archives sets, the designs are all borrowed from older Topps products.  

There are the 2011 Rookies insert that is a copy of the 1980s Rack Pack All-Star cards.  




Hank Conger with a Hooters ad over his shoulder.  

There are 1975 Topps Minis. Miniature in real life, but not here because of the scan.  




There are also relic cards with the 1975 Topps Mini design. I am sure that there are a few floating around in one of my boxes of relics, but I am not going to go surfing for one at the moment.  

We also have the 1964 Topps Stand-Ups.  



Love the green and yellow backgrounds on these cards.  

There are also autographs. There were some decent current player autographs in this set. Early autographs of Stanton, Posey, and Freeman. I bought a box of Lineage while I was on vacation in St. Louis back in the day and ended up with a Charlie Morton autograph.  




Charlie is pretty old now, but he's had some good seasons along the way.  Solid autograph. 

The autographs of the older players are really nice. I have a few of the players who appeared for the Cardinals. I will go with Duke point guard, Dick Groat for this post.  



The 1952 Topps design has been completely overused at this point, but what are you going to do?  


HOW DOES IT COMPARE?


 Lineage is essentially a Topps Archives set. I like that they do not recycle former flagship set designs on the base cards. I think that is the biggest positive here, along with some of the autographs. There is nothing here that really stands out to me, so I am going to go with the bottom half of my rankings.

In my opinion, it is not as good as the first four sets in the bottom half of my Set Appreciation posts. So, that's below the Heritage Minors, Emotion XL, Donruss, and Bowman. I thought long and hard about how this set compares to the Ionix and Bowman Platinum set. I was tempted to put it behind both of those sets, but I think the autographs are the saving grace here. 

Yes, copying the design of the 1952 Topps set is slightly annoying, but they are good looking cards. I am ranking the Topps Lineage set 11th.  


Sunday, July 10, 2022

Pujols Parade - 2005 Fleer Ultra

I have always really enjoyed the picture on the front of this card. In fact, I just really like this card. The whole thing. Front and back.  

Fair or foul?

Home run or strike? 

Albert is hopeful.  


This Cardinals fan thinks it's a home run.



This Cubs fan isn't quite sure......



Don't worry, guy. Zambrano's career still turns out better than Jack Morris with less incidents of sexually harassing college interns and saying stupid things on Tigers broadcasts.  

I obviously love the picture on the front of the card.  

Back of the card.  



I don't love all the dead space at the bottom of the card, but it's a far better option than having an overly busy back. There are some things that Fleer did really well here.  I like the overall design with the portrait head shot, the script-written name at the top, and the large card number (Hello!). 

This is a low-key, really good Albert Pujols card.  

Sunday, July 3, 2022

The Final Giant Update

I have long dreamed about typing this post. 

There has not been much time for writing lately, so I am glad I have a three day weekend to crank out a post or two.  

I did not think it would take this long, but here we are with the final few cards that I needed to finish off my set of 1964 Topps Giants cards. Thank you to everyone who helped out along the way, whether you traded or sold me cards, or were just here to cheer me on. I could not do it without you.  

There are only two Hall of Fame players in this post, so lets start the post with one of them.  



Yaz is not a short-print, nor a very expensive card. The centering is a little off side-to-side, but the condition of the card is good. I like the portrait photo with him looking over his shoulder. 

Back of the card, which mentions the Raleigh Capitols. 



Yaz was actually really young here, so the Minor League write-up on the back does not feel quite as out of place. He played on the Raleigh Capitols before the team folded. Yaz had one of their more memorable seasons by an individual player. The Bulls were merged with the Raleigh baseball franchise at one point, but they do not claim their players, so the season by Yaz flies under the radar locally. It's a shame that there is not any recognition of the Minor League players from that franchise.   

A common theme amongst the final players posted here, I learned a lot about players I knew little about.  


I only own one other John Romano card, which is a 1967 Topps card of him on the Cardinals. I am not going to post it here, but he has some combination of a 1950s flattop and slick-backed hair all rolled into one picture. He's wearing a sleeveless vest uniform, which I had long attributed to the Reds, but now know it's an Indians jersey. 

Romano was actually a really good player for a time in the 1950s and 1960s.  




Romano was a good hitting catcher with pop who made a few All-Star games playing for the White Sox and Indians. He ended his career with the 1967 Cardinals as the backup catcher behind Tim McCarver.  He was not on the Postseason roster, but still spent the season with the team.  

Next, Red Sox pitcher, Dick Radatz.  



The front of the card is a little worn, but I am going to live with it. 



Radatz played in the wrong era. He was a gigantic person who threw really, really hard. He played in a time where relief pitchers were minimized. Radatz struck out a ton of batters and led the American League in saves twice. He seems like he would fit in really well with modern baseball better than the 1960s.    

The second Hall of Famer in the post.....



I know Aparicio spent the second half of his career with the Orioles and Red Sox, but he's a player I always associate solely with the White Sox. It's jarring to see him on a non-White Sox card. Sort of like those Dale Murphy cards where he is on the Phillies or Rockies.  



I really like the back of this card. The entirety is spent on his Major League career and does a good job of focusing on his strengths as a player, which were stealing bases and playing defense.  One of the better write-ups in the set. I even like the small black and white photo of Aparicio sliding into second base.  

Next,Tigers pitcher, Dave Wickersham.  



He actually passed away last week while I was drafting this post. Wickersham was 86. 

Wickersham had an interesting career. 


As stated on the back of the card, the Tigers thought enough of him that they traded Rocky Colovito to the A's to add him to their rotation. He was a middle of the road pitcher with the A's, but was great for the Tigers in 1964. Wickersham won 19 games that season and was ejected in the seventh inning of his final start with the game tied 1-1 in the 7th inning pitching for his 20th win.  

The Vintage Detroit blog did a good write-up on the incident.  

Wickersham did not do much after 1964, but did end up with the expansion Kansas City Royals for his final season, making him one of three players to appear for both the Royals and A's in Kansas City.  The window between the A's moving (1967) and the Royals starting (1969) was narrow enough its surprising that it was not a more common occurrence.  

Next up, Albie Pearson.  



I was not overly familiar with Albie Pearson before tracking down this card, but I do like the picture on the front of this card. It's got to be a Spring Training photo with the mountains in the background. The Angels train in Arizona.  



I like that they mention his height and weight. After looking him up, it seems that he was most notable for being a really small person playing professional baseball more than any single event or season. I tried to see if I could find an Albie Pearson and Frank Howard picture, or some other really huge player, floating around on the internet. Something similar to the Jose Altuve and Aaron Judge photos that pop up everywhere when the Astros and Yankees play.

I found nothing, so here is Aaron Judge and Jose Altuve. I am sure Frank Howard and Albie Pearson would have looked the same.   



Maybe taking pictures of extraordinarily tall players next to extraordinarily short players is more recent phenomenon.  

Next up, "The Turk". 



Farrell was a tall, hard-throwing relief pitcher for the Dodgers and Phillies for the majority of his career. However, the expansion Colt 45s selected him in the expansion draft and used him as a starting pitcher. He had some good years as a starter, but he later returned to the Phillies as a relief pitcher to end his career. Nice portrait photograph on the front of the card. 



The centering on the back of the card isn't great, but I am going to live with it for the moment. The back describes his All-Star appearance in the 1958 game, which I thought was likely to be his career highlight.  It turns out that he actually ended up making the National League All-Star team 5 different times. Four of those were with the expansion Astros, so it could be that he was just the best player on those teams.   

Farrell's son, Richard Dotson, played for the White Sox in the late 1970s and 1980s. 

Another player I did not know much about.....



Chuck Hinton.

You should know this guy.  

He is actually a local player who went to high school in Rocky Mount, which is about an hour east of Raleigh. Hinton went to Shaw University, a small HBCU in Raleigh before he got drafted into the Army for Vietnam. Hinton had a late start to his career, reaching the Majors at the age of 27, but he was a good player for a short time. At the peak of his career, Hinton was a 20 steal, 20 home run player.  

Most importantly, Hinton founded the Major League Players Alumni Association after his career. There are people who, rather convincingly, argue that he is a person who should be in the Hall of Fame as a contributor to the game for starting up the Players Alumni Association. As the argument goes, he is likely tied to Curt Flood for admission into the Hall.  



Here is the back of the card, which spends most of the time talking about his Minor League career.  

Two cards left.  


Dick Ellsworth played during the 1960s, decent pitcher, but was always on the wrong teams. I kind of feel bad for him when I run into his cards. In 1963, Ellsworth went 22-10 for the Cubs. However, he also had a season where he went 9-20, another where he was 8-22. Not his fault. At one point in the late 1960s, Ellsworth ended up on the Red Sox. Otherwise, his career was spent with the Cubs (not good), the Indians (not good), and the Brewers during their first two years of existence (not good).   

Ellsworth played thirteen years and his career record is 20 games under .500. He also has a career ERA of 3.72. If he had been on good teams, you can imagine his career would have been a lot different. People who argue that wins is a misleading statistic sometimes use Ellsworth's career as an example. Decent pitcher with horrible results, largely due to where he played.  



The back of his card focuses on a one-hitter Ellsworth pitched against the Phillies in 1963. Not mentioned is the fact that Wes Covington bunted to break up the no-hitter. Also in the box score, this gem. Top line.  


The last card. 



Dean Chance won the 1964 American League Cy Young Award with 20 wins and an ERA of 1.65. He had some good seasons with the Angels and Twins, but not a very long career. He was much more noted for his off the field activities than his on the field activities at different points during his career, along with Angels teammate Bo Belinsky. After spending his 20s hanging out at the Playboy mansion, Chance spent his retirement working as a carnival operator.  



The back of the card is the standard with a short write up about a single game and a whole bunch of stuff about Chance's Minor League career.  

That's it, the entire 1964 Topps Giants set.  

106.

Blake Snell number 106 is just a red herring to make two other announcements.      Announcement #1- I have not written very often in this sp...