Pretty simple choice for the #MyCardMonday pick this week. It was good to sit down and end my weekend by watching the Cardinals and Cubs play on Sunday Night Baseball. It's great to get that first win out of the way quickly and I was happy to see Adam Wainwright have a good outing. This week's card comes from the 2007 Topps Finest set. Wainwright does not have a ton of different autographs, almost all of them come from early in his career, but there is a good quantity of each autograph. Meaning it's not too difficult to find copies of these cards. This card has a nice write up on Wainwright's Game 7 strike out of Mets outfielder Carlos Beltran which put the Cardinals in the 2006 World Series.
Monday, April 6, 2015
#MyCardMonday
Pretty simple choice for the #MyCardMonday pick this week. It was good to sit down and end my weekend by watching the Cardinals and Cubs play on Sunday Night Baseball. It's great to get that first win out of the way quickly and I was happy to see Adam Wainwright have a good outing. This week's card comes from the 2007 Topps Finest set. Wainwright does not have a ton of different autographs, almost all of them come from early in his career, but there is a good quantity of each autograph. Meaning it's not too difficult to find copies of these cards. This card has a nice write up on Wainwright's Game 7 strike out of Mets outfielder Carlos Beltran which put the Cardinals in the 2006 World Series.
Sunday, April 5, 2015
Collecting the Durham Bulls: Corey Brown
This is an easy shopping list and pretty inexpensive. Corey Brown has been around for awhile and has a fair number of cards for interested collectors. His first cards were released almost immediately after the A's used a sandwich pick (59th overall) to take the outfielder out of Oklahoma State. There were several different autographed cards to choose from.....
The cheaper options on Brown cards come from Minor League sets like the Just Minors and Tristar products. By cheaper I mean that you can find these cards easily for 2 to 3 dollars. I like the Just card since he is pictured in his Oklahoma State uniform. Brown also has an autograph in the 2007 Donruss Elite set. Again, he is pictured in an Oklahoma State jersey. His Tristar autograph features him on the Vancouver Canadians team. It's better than having a blanked out card, but still I like the college baseball cards better. Just personal opinion.
Better option: Find a copy of Corey Brown's 2007 Bowman Chrome Autograph. The card might cost you an extra dollar or fifty cents above the Just or Donruss autograph, but finding autographs out of the Bowman products is rarely a bad thing. Brown's Bowman Chrome autograph is an on card signature and features a nice picture which does not really look airbrushed. Is it? Can't tell.
Brown has one other Major League Baseball card release in the 2012 Topps Heritage set. It's a prospect card featuring Brown as a member of the Nationals. The card also features Michael Taylor, Adron Chambers, and Joe Benson. Again, not hard to find and not expensive to buy. This card usually costs less than fifty cents.
Brown also has several different Minor League team issues. He has been in the Minors since 2007 and has been in Triple A since 2010. Much of his time has been spent with the Syracuse Chiefs, but last season was spent with the Pawtucket Red Sox. Brown has made some brief appearances with the Nationals and Red Sox. As a Tampa native I am sure Brown would be excited to get a chance to play for the Rays this season.
Saturday, April 4, 2015
Opening Day Mediocrity
I decided to take a test drive on the Periscope app and needed a test subject to try out. I picked up two blasters ($9.99 each) from my local Target to use as my muse. I am not sure I have opened more than a pack of Opening Day since 2000. In my opinion, Opening Day is just a cheaply made rehash of the regular Topps set with a flashy flag bunting and logo on the card. I will go ahead and walk that opinion back a little bit, but not all the way.
Essentially the base set of the Opening Day product is a rehash of the base Topps set. Same pictures, but limited run of players. Opening Day has been this way for years, but Topps has added a few other features to the product to improve the quality just a little bit. I actually really like the look of the blue parallels out of the Opening Day set. I think I said the same thing about the gold parallels in the regular set.
I like these and pulled a total of four of them out of my two Blaster boxes. I feel like the blue border just gives the cards a little bit of a different look than the regular Opening Day cards. The color gives it a little bit more distance from the regular Topps set. On to the inserts.....
In past years Opening Day did not have any inserts. I went through and looked at some of the older sets and it looks like the inserts have been in Opening Day for the last five or six years. I guess the inserts include autographs and relic cards though I did not pull any of them.
The Stadium Scenes cards feature pictures by fans. A lot of the cards seem to feature players signing autographs like the Sean Doolittle card above. Again, there are some unique players in this set. I saw Sean Doolittle play for UVa back in the day and have enjoyed following his career. Cool to see him on an insert. I also landed a Jordan Zimmerman and a cool card of Yasiel Puig and the Gateway Arch.
The rest of the insert cards seem kind of blah. The mascot cards are back.....
Same with the celebration cards. Weren't these a variation in the regular Topps set? meh and a yawn.
Last two insert sets look like copies of Upper Deck insert sets from the 2000s.
These look a lot like something out of the 2001 Upper Deck 1970s Baseball set, but that product is a lot cooler than Opening Day. If you read the Night Owl Blog he always has posts about that set.
This looks like the holographic cards out of the 2004 Upper Deck Vintage set. Again, the Upper Deck set is much better.
Overall this is a real hit or miss product. I spent $20 on 22 packs, but would have probably been better served just buying one or two of the insert sets off of Ebay. The base set is a not so nice rehash of the regular Topps base set and some of the insert sets have gotten a little long in the tooth and are missable.
Essentially the base set of the Opening Day product is a rehash of the base Topps set. Same pictures, but limited run of players. Opening Day has been this way for years, but Topps has added a few other features to the product to improve the quality just a little bit. I actually really like the look of the blue parallels out of the Opening Day set. I think I said the same thing about the gold parallels in the regular set.
I like these and pulled a total of four of them out of my two Blaster boxes. I feel like the blue border just gives the cards a little bit of a different look than the regular Opening Day cards. The color gives it a little bit more distance from the regular Topps set. On to the inserts.....
In past years Opening Day did not have any inserts. I went through and looked at some of the older sets and it looks like the inserts have been in Opening Day for the last five or six years. I guess the inserts include autographs and relic cards though I did not pull any of them.
The two most common insert sets in the Opening Day product are the Hit the Dirt and Stadium Scenes cards. I like both inserts for the same reason: unique players. I like Ian Kinsler, good player, but when do you see him get an insert card? Next to never. These Hit the Dirt inserts are pretty easy to track down and I picked up six of these cards in my packs. Should be easy to finish off.
The Stadium Scenes cards feature pictures by fans. A lot of the cards seem to feature players signing autographs like the Sean Doolittle card above. Again, there are some unique players in this set. I saw Sean Doolittle play for UVa back in the day and have enjoyed following his career. Cool to see him on an insert. I also landed a Jordan Zimmerman and a cool card of Yasiel Puig and the Gateway Arch.
The rest of the insert cards seem kind of blah. The mascot cards are back.....
Does the White Sox card even have a name? Not sure about that. I think Opening Day has done mascots for a few years now. It seems that a lot of the chatter surrounding this set involves these mascot cards. I am not sure why. I guess it was cool once or twice, but maybe the well is running dry.
Last two insert sets look like copies of Upper Deck insert sets from the 2000s.
These look a lot like something out of the 2001 Upper Deck 1970s Baseball set, but that product is a lot cooler than Opening Day. If you read the Night Owl Blog he always has posts about that set.
This looks like the holographic cards out of the 2004 Upper Deck Vintage set. Again, the Upper Deck set is much better.
Overall this is a real hit or miss product. I spent $20 on 22 packs, but would have probably been better served just buying one or two of the insert sets off of Ebay. The base set is a not so nice rehash of the regular Topps base set and some of the insert sets have gotten a little long in the tooth and are missable.
Friday, April 3, 2015
Friday Five: Best 5 Sets From 1990
The last couple of Friday Five posts were focused on 1980s cards, but it starts to get a little bit more complicated after that decade. The 90s brought in a boom of new products, some good and some not so good, which makes it harder to break down sets by brand. I could have continued that same line of posts and just used the base sets for Fleer, Donruss, Upper Deck, and Topps, but there are all sorts of complications even within that.
So, instead I am going to spend my Friday's during this baseball season counting down the best five sets from each year. And by best five I am not speaking of value, although it's a consideration, same with design, player selection, and all sorts of other factors. Basically, I am looking through boxes of cards for the year and pulling out cards from five sets I really like....Deal with it.
The card sets are ranked in order from least liked to best liked. 1990 there were still a reasonable number of cards sets. Besides the five sets listed below I also considered: Fleer Update, Topps Traded, Score, Score Rookie/Traded, and Donruss The Rookies. Your consolation trophy is in the mail....
5. Donruss- This card design is a mixture of Eddie Van Halen's guitar and one of those Jasper Johns drizzle paintings. You won't see Donruss on this list for a while after this one, because in my opinion, the products went drastically down hill after this one. The 1990 Donruss set still had a similar feel to the 1988 plaids and the 1989 black borders. It was the largest Donruss set up to that point, over 700 cards, but still kept a lot of the trademark Donruss features like the Diamond Kings and Rated Rookies subsets. There were also a ton of minor errors in this set, which people swore were going to be worth something in 1990, but are actually not worth much of anything today.
Can we also talk about the smell of the cards? There are people that swear by certain smells in certain sets. I am not really too sensitive to the smells that come out of packs of cards, but for some reason this set hits my sense of smell. It always has. Don't think that I ran around huffing Scotch Guard or something as a middle schooler, but if you blindfolded me and asked me to identify a 1990 Donruss card I would know the smell anywhere. Not a bad smell, not good, it's just there....
4. Fleer- Not as interesting design wise as the Donruss set, but there are a bunch of different things I like about the Fleer set. First, there are a bunch of good rookies in the set. All of these sets actually have them: Sosa, Thomas, Larry Walker, and Juan Gonzalez. Others are unique to Fleer, like the Moises Alou rookie.....
The set also had some of the staples of 1980s Fleer sets like the SuperStar cards. The Players of the Decade inset set is also a really nice touch in this set. Throw in the fact that Fleer did a little better job of editing their set and I put it just ahead of the Donruss set.
3. Topps- I like the design. Seriously, this seems like a take or leave kind of year. This set has a bunch of the usual 1990 rookie cards, Frank Thomas and Sammy Sosa, but also has a few other really cool things going for it too. The set has the normal 792 cards you would expect to see out of this era of Topps set, but the best part of this set is the Nolan Ryan subset....
2. Upper Deck- I am a huge fan of the Upper Deck set. It was still pretty much alone in being a high end set in 1990 and it's not all that different from the 1989 set. Same card stock, similar elements in the design, but it just missed out on the rookie cards. I am not sure I can really fault Upper Deck for the fact that Ray Lankford and Sammy Sosa did not pan out quite the same way as Ken Griffey Jr. Believe me, I would love it if Ray Lankford had that sort of card value. The backs of the cards are really awesome too.....
1. Leaf- Notice on the Upper Deck write up I said that it was almost the only premier baseball card product released in 1990. Donruss created this product to directly compete with Upper Deck that summer. Foil packaging, better card stock, and color photos on the front and back. Leaf was supposed to be the rival of Upper Deck and it actually did one better than that. If I was going to tell you to buy one set from the 1990 set this would be the one. While the rookies in the set are essentially the same names as the other 1990s products, Walker, Thomas, and Sammy Sosa, the cards out of this set have been far more popular and desired by collectors. Easily the best set from 1990.
Thursday, April 2, 2015
Back to the DAP
Back in January I made a trip to the original Durham Athletic Park to look around the outside of the stadium. I vowed to take in a game at the stadium this year and fulfilled my promise yesterday when I attended the NC Central/Virginia State baseball game. I was really interested to see the inside of the stadium and to see how the park played during an actual game. It was really cool.
I love the entrance to the stadium. I imagined it to be much bigger from the movie, but it's entry way is really unique with the round tower out in front of the stadium. I had explored most of the outside of the stadium on my January trip and got to the game a few minutes early to check out the inside of the DAP. However, there was not a lot of spaces to really explore.
This is the view fans have when they walk through the entrance to the seating area of the Durham Athletic Park. The space is really simple, but in a good way. There aren't cup holders or fancy gimmicks in the seats of this park, which was built in 1940. Instead fans can find a simple set of benches and seats which offered a nice shaded view of the field. The entire grandstand is protected by a netting, which is probably a good thing since you are really close to the field.
In my opinion, the two most unique features of the stadium are the outfield configuration in right field and the design of the grandstand. Let's start with the grandstand. In the movie Bull Durham, most people are familiar with the green and gold pattern of the grandstand at the Durham Athletic Park.
I looked around for older pictures of the stadium, and while the color of the wall has changed several times over the years, the unique pattern and design of the grandstand remains the same. Currently it is painted a rust color with a goldfish, yellow color framing the rectangular patterns.
You will notice in the background behind Kevin Costner the on-deck circles are kind of in the distance and in the middle of nowhere. The dugouts are down the line a bit, similar to Fenway, and the players tend to stand in their own places and call it the on deck circle. NC Central outfielder Eric Kimber drifted way down the line and was standing really close to home plate while waiting his turn to bat.
The insides of the dugout also look a little bit limited in space. Both teams seemed to use the top of the dugout as a storage area for gloves, helmets, baseballs, and bottles.
Also notice that the radio both behind home plate. Looks a little bit like Dodger Stadium before they remodeled it, but the Durham Athletic Park is actually older than that stadium. Which brings us to right field. The fence down the right field line is only 290 feet. The wall down the line is taller and the power alley is not labeled, but it is clearly the place to hit the ball in the stadium. Here's what the right field corner looks like now.....
and who could forget this scene from Bull Durham which shows what the right field area looked like while the Durham Bulls were using the park.....
I love the entrance to the stadium. I imagined it to be much bigger from the movie, but it's entry way is really unique with the round tower out in front of the stadium. I had explored most of the outside of the stadium on my January trip and got to the game a few minutes early to check out the inside of the DAP. However, there was not a lot of spaces to really explore.
This is the view fans have when they walk through the entrance to the seating area of the Durham Athletic Park. The space is really simple, but in a good way. There aren't cup holders or fancy gimmicks in the seats of this park, which was built in 1940. Instead fans can find a simple set of benches and seats which offered a nice shaded view of the field. The entire grandstand is protected by a netting, which is probably a good thing since you are really close to the field.
In my opinion, the two most unique features of the stadium are the outfield configuration in right field and the design of the grandstand. Let's start with the grandstand. In the movie Bull Durham, most people are familiar with the green and gold pattern of the grandstand at the Durham Athletic Park.
I looked around for older pictures of the stadium, and while the color of the wall has changed several times over the years, the unique pattern and design of the grandstand remains the same. Currently it is painted a rust color with a goldfish, yellow color framing the rectangular patterns.
You will notice in the background behind Kevin Costner the on-deck circles are kind of in the distance and in the middle of nowhere. The dugouts are down the line a bit, similar to Fenway, and the players tend to stand in their own places and call it the on deck circle. NC Central outfielder Eric Kimber drifted way down the line and was standing really close to home plate while waiting his turn to bat.
The insides of the dugout also look a little bit limited in space. Both teams seemed to use the top of the dugout as a storage area for gloves, helmets, baseballs, and bottles.
Also notice that the radio both behind home plate. Looks a little bit like Dodger Stadium before they remodeled it, but the Durham Athletic Park is actually older than that stadium. Which brings us to right field. The fence down the right field line is only 290 feet. The wall down the line is taller and the power alley is not labeled, but it is clearly the place to hit the ball in the stadium. Here's what the right field corner looks like now.....
and who could forget this scene from Bull Durham which shows what the right field area looked like while the Durham Bulls were using the park.....
The stadium is built into a city block and the buildings in the movie are clearly the same. In fact, I think that the only thing that has really changed in the space is that the wall has gone from billboards to some sort of chain linked fence. NC Central actually took advantage of the short porch to right during the game and connected for two home runs.
So, let's get to the game. Both of these teams play in the MAEC, which is Division I. Central has a newer baseball program, but I was really impressed by the team. I did a little bit of pre-scouting and had a few players I was watching for in the game. I missed one of the pitchers, but was impressed by everyone else I got to see.....
Let's start with Christian Triplett. He did not have a hit in this game, and has had some bad luck this year with hits falling, but I like the way he played. Here's his first at-bat....
A video posted by The Snorting Bull (@thesnortingbull) on
The junior was one of the team's top offensive producer last season leading the team in home runs and was amongst the leaders in RBIs. The numbers are not quite there at the plate this year for the junior first baseman, but I think he has some potential. He's a big target at first base and moves well on defense.
I also enjoyed watching lead off hitter Eric Kimber. He has great patience at the plate and clearly understands his role as a lead off hitter is to get on base. He is leading NC Central's regular players with a .383 OBP and drew 3 walks which lead to 2 runs during this game. He also stole a base and played some good defense out in right field. Here he is in the second drawing a walk.
A video posted by The Snorting Bull (@thesnortingbull) on
The third and finally player I enjoyed watching was junior pitcher Cameron Scalzo. He ended up going 7 innings and gave up 1 run, five hits, and struck out six batters. Here's a look at the tall right hander throwing pitcher......
Central won this game fairly easily. Scalzo gave up an early run, but was backed up by two six run frames. In the second inning the Eagles posted their first six spot after a Virginia State error allowed several extra base runners. The big blow in the inning came from catcher Conrad Kovalcik who took advantage of the short right field porch to blast a three run home run. NC Central added another 6 in the bottom of the 7th to go up 14-1 which ended up being the final score.
Overall, it was a fun afternoon of baseball. The quality of play was much better than I expected and the atmosphere of a college team playing in the old Durham Athletic Park is really awesome. If you live in central North Carolina and are looking for an inexpensive (their games are free) and entertaining activity this is great entertainment. The Eagles still have several more home games left this season including games against in state schools like UNC-Wilmington and Campbell. I will definitely be back for another game before the season ends.
Tuesday, March 31, 2015
One Year on Bunt
Around this time last year I discovered the BUNT app. I played around with it for a few weeks and finally made a post, it was kind of negative, sometime around mid-May. The post ended up starting up a few dialogues with a few other collectors, some of whom totally trashed the app, while others thought I was a little bit off in my evaluation. So, then a funny thing happened....
I spent the last year building up a collection on BUNT. Now, I am not going to profess to being a super BUNT fan, nor am I a genius about building up my card collection on the site. However, every day I went on to the app, collected my coins, and at some point during the week spent a little bit of time opening up packs of cards. So, can I rewrite that BUNT evaluation now that I have spent a full year saving coins and opening packs? Let's go for it.
After dropping the whole fantasy aspect of BUNT and just working on collecting cards the app became much more enjoyable. I almost felt like I was collecting cards as a kid again. I would save up my coins on BUNT for a week and at the end I would buy a few packs. When I was a kid I got a few packs every week when my parents went to Dierbergs. Slowly, but surely, I put together a Topps BUNT set and also started working on some of the colored parallels.
The cards in the base set are essentially the same as the regular Topps set, but I put that together in two box breaks. This set took weeks and weeks to assemble. I tried to buy packs which gave me a chance to land inserts. Some weeks I was successful, other weeks not so much. Some of my favorite insert sets this year were......
BUNT may not be the most comfortable thing for long time collectors, but it presented me a new challenge as a collector which I am still trying to learn. I've made it a little bit more simplistic than my actual baseball card collection, but most importantly I have had fun collecting these cards. Oh, did I mention that the BUNT App is free and the cards are basically free too? If you have already tried BUNT and it's not your thing I completely understand, but if you have not spent anytime on it, it's worth a few minutes of your time.
I spent the last year building up a collection on BUNT. Now, I am not going to profess to being a super BUNT fan, nor am I a genius about building up my card collection on the site. However, every day I went on to the app, collected my coins, and at some point during the week spent a little bit of time opening up packs of cards. So, can I rewrite that BUNT evaluation now that I have spent a full year saving coins and opening packs? Let's go for it.
After dropping the whole fantasy aspect of BUNT and just working on collecting cards the app became much more enjoyable. I almost felt like I was collecting cards as a kid again. I would save up my coins on BUNT for a week and at the end I would buy a few packs. When I was a kid I got a few packs every week when my parents went to Dierbergs. Slowly, but surely, I put together a Topps BUNT set and also started working on some of the colored parallels.
The cards in the base set are essentially the same as the regular Topps set, but I put that together in two box breaks. This set took weeks and weeks to assemble. I tried to buy packs which gave me a chance to land inserts. Some weeks I was successful, other weeks not so much. Some of my favorite insert sets this year were......
The Postseason set had a good run of players from each of the team's in this year's MLB playoffs, plus several extra Royals and Giants cards featuring a World Series motif. I put together a big chunk of this set and especially had a good time trying to track down the Cardinals. I did not end up with everything that I wanted, but it was still a good time. I like that the packs of the Postseason cards also only featured the Postseason set. It was a good way to take a little break from the base set for a few weeks.
There were also all kinds of cool throw back cards too. Why did Topps put in a 1974 Archives set? Why is there a James Loney card in the set? I really do not care. It looks different and has all sorts of players who normally do not get any love in a regular issued insert set. There is also a Seth Smith in here....Way cool.
and now for my best Bunt card of the year.....
If this were only a really card.....It's still a fun thing to look at on my phone.
We are all done looking at cards now, but you should still read the rest of the post. I enjoyed the past year of collecting on BUNT and am looking forward to working on the 2015 cards later this week. In fact I was excited when this message popped up on my phone yesterday.....
Collecting the Durham Bulls: Grayson Garvin
Grayson Garvin was apart of the Rays Draft Class in 2011. The Rays had ten of the first sixty picks in the draft. The team took Taylor Guerrieri, Mikie Mahtook, Jake Hager, Brandon Martin, Tyler Goeddel, Jeff Ames, Blake Snell, Kes Carter, James Harris, and Grayson Garvin. None of those players have reached the Majors yet and there are many baseball experts who have taken notice. I remember reading a string of Peter Gammons tweets last fall about the disappointment of this draft class for Rays, but there is still hope for several of these players including former Vanderbilt star Grayson Garvin.
Repeat after me: Wins do not matter. Okay. Garvin has a career 3-14 mark as a starter in the Minors. I know there are some people who just cringed a little bit and are seriously contemplating something else to read, but hang with me for a moment. The left handed pitcher has compiled that record over 41 minor league starts over three years. While the win loss record is not great there are a couple of positives to be found in the numbers.
First, Garvin has given up less than a hit per inning. Even better, he has only allowed six home runs and forty-two walks in three years of pitching in the minors. So, Garvin keeps batters off base and keeps them in the yard, but has not won very many games. While he is a really big guy, 6'6 and 225, and throws hard, he is much more Justin Masterson than flame throwing strike out pitcher.
I actually think that Garvin could have a good year pitching for the Bulls given some of the good defenders the team will have on the infield this year. I do not usually use this space to make predictions, but I will throw this out there: Grayson Garvin will have three wins by the middle of May. He won three games this fall, in six starts, pitching in the Arizona Fall League. I'd say the end of April, but I figure the Bulls might lose a game here and there at some point. Plus there is the dreaded no decision.
Cardwise, Grayson Garvin has some really limited options. As always, there are always team sets like last year's Montgomery Biscuits team issued set. Beyond the team sets the options bill down to two 2011 issues. Gavin has several 2011 Donruss Elite cards including an autographed card and all of the colored variations. I do not own one of these, but am on the lookout for one.
The Garvin card that I do own comes from the 2011 Prime Cuts product. Like the Donruss Elite set, it's a non-licensed product and features Garvin wearing a goofy blanked out hat....
it's also a sticker autograph (sigh). I am a little surprised that Garvin has never appeared in a Bowman or a Topps Minor League product, but maybe they were too busy reading that wins line on his stat sheet. I am guessing that a good season in Triple A this year could Garvin a slot in a product like Topps Pro Debut or Minor League Heritage.
Repeat after me: Wins do not matter. Okay. Garvin has a career 3-14 mark as a starter in the Minors. I know there are some people who just cringed a little bit and are seriously contemplating something else to read, but hang with me for a moment. The left handed pitcher has compiled that record over 41 minor league starts over three years. While the win loss record is not great there are a couple of positives to be found in the numbers.
First, Garvin has given up less than a hit per inning. Even better, he has only allowed six home runs and forty-two walks in three years of pitching in the minors. So, Garvin keeps batters off base and keeps them in the yard, but has not won very many games. While he is a really big guy, 6'6 and 225, and throws hard, he is much more Justin Masterson than flame throwing strike out pitcher.
I actually think that Garvin could have a good year pitching for the Bulls given some of the good defenders the team will have on the infield this year. I do not usually use this space to make predictions, but I will throw this out there: Grayson Garvin will have three wins by the middle of May. He won three games this fall, in six starts, pitching in the Arizona Fall League. I'd say the end of April, but I figure the Bulls might lose a game here and there at some point. Plus there is the dreaded no decision.
Cardwise, Grayson Garvin has some really limited options. As always, there are always team sets like last year's Montgomery Biscuits team issued set. Beyond the team sets the options bill down to two 2011 issues. Gavin has several 2011 Donruss Elite cards including an autographed card and all of the colored variations. I do not own one of these, but am on the lookout for one.
The Garvin card that I do own comes from the 2011 Prime Cuts product. Like the Donruss Elite set, it's a non-licensed product and features Garvin wearing a goofy blanked out hat....
it's also a sticker autograph (sigh). I am a little surprised that Garvin has never appeared in a Bowman or a Topps Minor League product, but maybe they were too busy reading that wins line on his stat sheet. I am guessing that a good season in Triple A this year could Garvin a slot in a product like Topps Pro Debut or Minor League Heritage.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
106.
Blake Snell number 106 is just a red herring to make two other announcements. Announcement #1- I have not written very often in this sp...
-
2016 - 2017 Durham Bulls Background- The A's drafted Justin Marks out of the University of Louisville in the 3rd Round o...
-
One of my favorite baseball writers is Keith Law. I like reading his work and he's a pretty fun follow on Twitter, Instagram, and bl...
-
Blake Snell number 106 is just a red herring to make two other announcements. Announcement #1- I have not written very often in this sp...

























